The Talk Show American


Sunday, March 24, 2019

Special Counsel DID NOT FIND Trump Campaign Conspired With Russia

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Hill Report: Ukraine Officials Colluded With Clinton Campaign to Defeat Trump

….here's something you won't hear or see in the main stream news media.! The evidence of collusion keeps piling up...against Hillary Clinton's campaign that is.!

According to The Hill:

Ukraine prosecutor, General Yurii Lutsenko, said in an interview on Hill.TV on Wednesday that he has launched an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about Trump's then campaign chairman Paul Manafort in an effort to sway the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

The leak of the files to the U.S. main stream media prompted Manafort’s resignation from the Trump campaign and led to one of the key allegations in the Russia collusion probe that has dogged now President Trump for the past two and a half years.

The American Mirror reported:

The probe was sparked by a Ukrainian parliamentarian’s release of a tape recording purporting to quote a top law enforcement official saying his agency leaked the Manafort financial records to help Hillary Clinton’s campaign against Donald Trump.

MP Boryslav Rozenblat, a high-ranking member in the Verkohvna Rada of Ukraine, this week accused National Anti-Corruption Bureau chief Artem Sytnyk of leaking information about “black accounts” involving members of Trump’s campaign to Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election, according to the television station 112 UA.

Read More Here: Flag and Cross

Tuesday, March 05, 2019

Democrats Threaten to Come After Our Guns If SCOTUS Upholds National Emergency Declaration

Members of the Democratic Party are in full panic mode, doing whatever they can to stop the President Trump from building a wall to curtail illegal immigration, thus denying him yet another victory in keeping his campaign promises.

They are now threatening to infringe upon our Second Amendment rights if the SCOTUS declares President Trump's National Emergency Declaration constitutional. They say they will declare 'Gun Control' a National Emergency if a Democrat becomes President in 2020, Fox News reports.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi:

“Just think of what a president with different values can present to the American people, Want to talk about a national emergency? Let’s talk about today, the one year anniversary of another manifestation of the epidemic of gun violence in America. That’s a national emergency. Why don’t you declare that emergency Mr. President? I wish you would. But a Democratic president can do that. A Democratic President can declare emergencies as well.”

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn:

“100 people die from guns every day. That’s a national emergency. If Trump gets away w this border emergency declaration, then a Dem President can declare a gun violence emergency and institute universal background checks and an assault weapons ban by executive action.”

Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro:

“I will come into office with a strong belief that climate change is a national emergency, that the fact that so many people in this country die because of gun violence, that is a national emergency.”
“If the president’s action, in this case, is upheld by the Supreme Court, then it does open up new avenues for future presidents to take action.”

And they have plenty of company:

According to the NRA:

“Since 1991, the murder rate has fallen by 45 percent and the overall violent crime rate has fallen by 48 percent,” the pro-Second Amendment group said in a release. “At the same time that violent crime was falling, Americans were acquiring a record number of firearms.”

Does this mean that President Trump should abandon the wall and rescind his National Emergency Declaration? Absolutely not! But what it does mean is that we the people are going to have to go to the ballot boxes in 2020 and make sure the Democrat's Presidential candidate does not get elected.

There is no doubt in my mind that the Democrats will try this stunt whether or not the SCOTUS declares the National Emergency Declaration constitutional. They have become a party that is dangerous to the very existence of our Republic as witnessed by some of their congressional freshman. Don't make the same mistake in 2020!

Hat Tip: BPR

Friday, March 01, 2019

Candice Owens says Michael Cohen Approached Her to Lie About ‘Racist Trump’

Blexit and Turning Point USA political activist Candice Owens says Michael Cohen Approached Her to Lie About ‘Racist Trump’ last summer.

Candice tweeted out a private Twitter message Cohen sent her last summer.

“Should I go nuclear on Michael Cohen?”
“Should I go nuclear on Michael Cohen Who I know from years ago and who tried to approach me last summer to help “change the narrative” (also known as LIE) about the President?” Owens asked, adding, “Because I’m thinking I should. This coward plotted this entire “racist” lie to save himself.”

Maga Hat Tip To: The Gateway Pundit

Candice also has an upcoming new show, check it out !

Thursday, February 28, 2019

Bombshell Report: Obama's DOJ Shielded Hillary From Prosecution

A new report from The Epoch Times is shedding new light on the scandal. The report claims that it wasn’t just the FBI that tried to protect Hillary Clinton from prosecution.

According to the report, the Obama DOJ apparently told the Bureau that it wouldn’t prosecute Clinton, even before all the facts had emerged.

“The Justice Department (DOJ), under then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, decided to set an unusually high threshold for prosecution of Clinton, effectively ensuring from the outset that she would not be charged,” Epoch Times explained, citing congressional testimony that it said had previously not been publicized.

“In order for Clinton to be prosecuted, the DOJ required the FBI to establish evidence of intent—even though the gross negligence statute explicitly does not require this,” the report continued.

“Intent is a requirement of several statutes the FBI was looking into. But intent is specifically not a factor under the charge of gross negligence — contained within 18 U.S. Code § 793(f),” Epoch Times explained.

“Notably, Comey had been convinced to remove the term ‘gross negligence’ to describe Clinton’s actions from his prepared statement by, among others, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, FBI agent Peter Strzok, senior legal counsel Trisha Anderson, and FBI analyst Jonathan Moffa,” the report explained.

As the Epoch Times reported, a portion of FBI Lawyer, Lisa Page's testimony in front of Rep. John Ratcliffe, appears to verify that Page and the FBI received marching orders from Obama’s DOJ to stop investigating Clinton, because the DOJ would not prosecute her.

“(Y)ou’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —” began Ratcliffe.
“That is correct,” Page replied.
“— bring a case based on that,” finished the congressman.

“So there was no review as to whether there was negligence in this case?” House Majority Counsel Ryan Breitenbach asked during testimony.

“It was legally irrelevant because the Department of Justice would not have brought a prosecution in a circumstance in which there was simply negligence,” admitted Trisha Anderson, a top lawyer for the FBI.

The conclusion here seems to indicate that neither the Obama DOJ under Loretta Lynch's leadership, nor the FBI under James Comey's leadership were interested in pursuing even the lightest of charges against Hillary Clinton in Emailgate.

One wonders if the roles were reversed and it was a republican candidate who served government before pursuing the Presidency and had done the same, if they would have been treated so leniently. I think we all know the answer to that one !

Read More Here: The Western Journal and Here: The Epoch Times