J.R.'s Take: The Politically Correct BS Line on Kavanaugh's Accuser

This is it, I can't stand this anymore, stop saying you believe something happened to Christine Blasey Ford but Brett Kavanaugh didn't do it ! Every time someone says I believe something happened to Christine Blasey Ford but it wasn't Judge Kavanaugh, it lends credence to her claim. If no one remembers the incident or the party at all then it's a good chance the incident never happened, PERIOD!. People are afraid to say this or they say "I believe something happened to Christine Blasey Ford but it wasn't Judge Kavanaugh" .  I am not trying to criticize Sean Hannity (One of my Mentors), Judge Kavanaugh or the many Republican Politicians who have said this due to Political Correctness. I am just trying to point out that IF this incident happened at all, don't you think that her so called witnesses would have said, yes it happened but it was not Brett. They are saying they have NO knowledge of the incident or the party she speaks of regardless of who she accused ! Enough of this Political Correctness BS, a man's reputation and livelihood and his families dignity rest in the balance.

Remembering September 11 2001 - Never Forget !

Remember September 11, 2001 - Never Forget !

ANTIFA PROTESTING SOROS FOR NON PAYMENT OF FUNDS?

UPDATE: I did a little research on the video of the alleged Antifa Protesters calling out Soros for non-payment. It appears that this video have been around for about a year anyway. However, it does not dismiss the seriousness of this if it is true that Antifa is being financed by Soros directly or indirectly.

If this is true, then Soros should be investigated and indicted for Inciting Riots, Conspiracy, Being An Accomplice before and After the fact to Inciting Riots. This makes the so called Collusion with Russia look like a kiddie ride in comparison. But don't hold your breath.

ANTIFA PROTESTING SOROS FOR NON PAYMENT OF FUNDS! WHERE'S THE MONEY!! NO MONEY NO PROTEST SO MUCH FOR THE RESISTANCE! PAID TO BE ANGRY?? HOW REAL IS THAT? pic.twitter.com/CCFlGhYud3

— TIMENOUT (@TIMENOUT) August 31, 2018

See More Here:Antifa Protesting Soros Videos

Former CIA Agent Kevin Shipp – Indictments Coming for Hillary and Co-conspirators !

Former Central Intelligence Agency Agent and author Kevin Shipp is doing just what President Truman spoke about and recently dropped a bombshell in an interview with Sheila Zilinsky. During the interview, Shipp not only pointed out John Brennan's position as station chief in Saudi Arabia during the time that the 9-11 hijackers received their visas but also that Brennan converted to Islam during that time and his ties to the Communist Party and how indictments are waiting in the wings for the criminals of the Deep State.

Shipp makes no bones that there are dead bodies tied to Brennan, including those Americans killed in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, as well as Michael Hastings.

"Indictments are coming because of Donald Trump coming into the White House from the outside," says Shipp. "Trump cannot be bribed.”

Read More Here:Former CIA Agent Kevin Shipp Bombshell: Indictments Are Coming!

And Then There Were 15...Two Prosecutors Leave Special Counsel Mueller's Office - No Reason Given

Two prosecutors tasked with investigating allegations of possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election have left the Office of the Special Counsel.

Brian Richardson and Ryan Dickey, two “relatively junior,” members of Robert Mueller’s team, are no longer working directly for Mueller, according to the Justice Department.

In a statement to CNN, special counsel spokesperson Peter Carr affirmed both prosecutors did not exit the probe due to misconduct or perceived political bias, but refused to provide further details surrounding their departures.

Hmmm...This could be interesting ! https://t.co/5qJmTvjYP5

— The Talk Show American (@TalkShowAmerica) August 31, 2018

Read More Here:Two Prosecutors No Longer with Special Counsel Mueller’s Office

MSNBC 's Chuck Todd Warns of Possible Mueller Bombshell: ‘I Wouldn’t Miss Work Tomorrow’

MSNBC’s Chuck Todd issued a warning to the press on Thursday evening regarding the Russia investigation: Don’t miss work tomorrow.

Todd’s MTP Daily panel was discussing Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s probe, and speculating as to when the investigation will wrap up.

“Here’s what I’ve learned about Bob Mueller,” Todd said. “Not a single person that has known him, been with him, worked with him, wouldn’t say that he would have ended this investigation if there was no collusion. He would have already ended this investigation.”

“I’m not missing work tomorrow,” he continued. “I wouldn’t miss work tomorrow. Tomorrow is the last business day of the pre-Labor Day to Election Day window.”

MUELLER BOMBSHELL INCOMING ? What does Chuck Todd know and how does he know it or is he just grandstanding ?  https://t.co/PfoQTYso3F

— The Talk Show American (@TalkShowAmerica) August 31, 2018

Read More Here:Chuck Todd Warns of Possible Mueller Bombshell: ‘I Wouldn’t Miss Work Tomorrow’

Moronic Kathy Griffin Dances Topless in Front of Window to Celebrate Manafort and Cohen Verdicts

Stupid ! Even her dogs are embarrassed, they can't watch, I'm surprised they don't have their paws over their eyes.

I always thought she was a moron, she just removed all doubt.

The stupid virus is spreading, rapidly. Immunize yourself, STAT. https://t.co/Na9CWPdP64

— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) August 23, 2018

Former FEC Head Destroys Main Stream Media Claim that Trump Broke Campaign Finance Law

Fellow supporters of President Trump do not get discouraged this is all political theater. Cohen admitted to 2 counts of campaign finance violations which do not exist and even if they did are not crimes. The great one, Mark Levin, explains it all !https://t.co/iuKQ4cyAM6

— The Talk Show American (@TalkShowAmerica) August 22, 2018

“When the FEC wrote the regulation that says what constitutes campaign expenditures and what constitutes personal use, it rejected specifically the idea that a campaign expenditure was anything related to a campaign, and instead says it has to be something that exists only because of the campaign and solely for that reason,” Professor Bradley Smith told Levin Tuesday.

The expenditures alleged by Cohen, Smith explained, are not violations of campaign finance law even though they “might incidentally benefit your campaign,”


“The argument seems to be, and it hasn’t changed,” Levin summed up, “is that, if I spend money to make myself look better, or to take away negative issues in my private life, my business life, my employment life and use my own money, then somehow that is a campaign contribution…which it is not.”

Read More here: Fmr head of the FEC blows up media narrative that Trump broke the law, by referring to the actual law

Day 16 : Manafort Jury Struggling to Reach Unanimous Verdict on One Count

Manafort trial Day 16: Jury struggling to reach unanimous verdict on one count https://t.co/9fCxnG0lgS via @politico

— The Talk Show American (@TalkShowAmerica) August 21, 2018

The Real Colluders with Russia: Democrats, Intelligence Agencies, and the Main Stream Media

Don Jr. was emailed by a British music promoter, Rob Goldstone, who promised that the Russian “crown prosecutor” had information that would “incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia.” When the meeting took place, in walked two Russian nationals, Rinat Akhmetshin and Natalia Veselnitskaya, who proceeded to talk to Don Jr., Jared Kushner, and others about how Americans could once again adopt Russian children, if only the Magnitsky Act were repealed. Eyes surely rolled, and the meeting was ended. Kushner even messaged his assistant to try to come up with an excuse to leave the meeting early.

For those who belong to the religious cult of Trump-Russia collusion, this meeting is prima facie evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to rig the 2016 election. One of the sacraments of this cult is that its adherents wake up every morning and hope that on this day, just maybe, Trump will finally be done away with. CNN is of course central to this practice.

Keep in mind that during this time nobody knew that Russia had interfered in anything, aside from the regular deluge of phishing emails common to both Russian and Chinese hackers that were directed at both Democrats and Republicans.


CNN’s Chris Cillizza called the anonymously sourced report a “collusion bombshell,” and said it was maybe the “most important [event] of Donald Trump’s presidency.” One wonders how many times CNN and its employees have said similar things, only to see their hopes dashed?

The truth is that it doesn’t matter whether Trump knew of this meeting or not, or whether Mueller can ever prove that he did. Don Jr. and his associates did nothing wrong in setting up this meeting. But the events surrounding the meeting are damning for the intelligence agencies, the media, and the Democrat Party.

The Facts Behind The Trump Tower Meeting Are Incriminating, But Not For Trump

CNN Shuns Omarosa

Omarosa appears on networks trying to act like a victim but she comes off more like a conniving, manipulative control freak. So much so that even CNN shuns her !

Page Six reported Monday that CNN has either turned down an invitation to interview Omarosa or canceled on her numerous times since she began her media tour a few weeks ago.

"Don Lemon was offered one of the first cable interviews and passed," a source told CNN.

Omarosa was scheduled to sit down with Jake Tapper for an interview Sunday, but the network eventually cut her from the show's guest lineup.

"They only wanted to book guests with nothing positive to say about her," another source told CNN. "They were specifically looking for people who would provide a more negative slant when discussing Omarosa."

Omarosa's book is called "Unhinged: An Insider's Account of the Trump White House" and documents her time working in the White House in Trump's communications department.

Report: CNN Shuns Omarosa as She Peddles Book

Obama Revoked Security Clearances in 2013 at the Request of James Clapper

In 2013 Obama Scrubbed Security Clearances at the behest of then Director of National Intelligence James Clapper ! Whoops looks like the "unprecdented move" is not so "Unprecedented"

W.H. looks to scrub clearance list

The Talk Show American Daily Tweets

Poll: Americans Believe Obama ‘Improperly Surveilled’ Trump Campaign - Want Special Counsel

An IBD/TIPP poll shows “Americans overwhelmingly believe the Obama administration ‘improperly surveilled’ Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.”

A clear majority of 55 percent believe it is “likely” that the Obama administration “improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.” That includes 31 percent of Democrats, 87 percent of Republicans, and 55 percent of Independents.

A clear majority of 54 percent want a special counsel to investigate “whether the FBI and the Department of Justice improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election.” Only 44 percent said no. The partisan breakdown shows that 74 percent of Republicans and 50 percent of Independents want a special counsel — as do a full 44 percent of Democrats.

A just-released Rasmussen poll, however, shows that a full 50 percent of Americans “believe it’s at least somewhat likely senior federal law enforcement officials broke the law in an effort to prevent Donald Trump from winning the presidency.” Only 40 percent disagree.

Another Rasmussen poll from this week shows that only 42 percent of Americans believe Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election more than the FBI. Moreover, a full 34 percent believe the FBI meddled more than the Russians, while 24 percent are unsure.

In other words, we now live in a country where 58 percent of Americans either believe our own FBI meddled in a presidential election more than a hostile foreign government, or are not sure the FBI did not.

Meanwhile, Trump’s approval rating is running ahead of former-President Obama’s at this point in his failed presidency.

H/T: Briebart

FISA MEMO: What You Need To Know

FBI Missed Tons of Hillary's Classified Emails

Remember when Hillary claimed not to have sent emails on her private server that were marked classified ‘at the time they were sent?

That was a lie, but now we have proof and we also have proof that the FBI conveniently overlooked it.

The Inspector General has discovered among the text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page an interesting exchange in which Strzok wondered about the classified emails quite candidly, “If the FBI missed this, what else was missed?”

He continued, “It cuts against ‘I never sent or received anything marked classified’.”

The IG’s report will blow the whole thing open again.

One of the questions will be why they gave Hillary a pass on a criminal act she insisted she never committed.

The FBI didn’t flag that some emails from Hillary Clinton’s private email server were marked classified with a “(C)” when they were sent — something that seemingly would have been one of the first and most obvious checks in an investigation, and one that FBI agents instantly recognized put the facts at odds with Clinton’s public statements.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General noticed it after the FBI missed it, texts between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, reveal. “Holy cow,” Strzok wrote, “if the FBI missed this, what else was missed?”

“Remind me to tell you to flag for Andy [redacted] emails we (actually ICIG) found that have portion marks (C) on a couple of paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this,” he wrote.

“Found on the 30k [emails] provided to State originally. No one noticed. It cuts against ‘I never sent or received anything marked classified,’” he wrote, referring to statements by Clinton downplaying the danger of her email practices.

H/T Conservative Alerts

Judge Rules Against LGBT Activists in Suit Against Bake Shop Owner

A Christian bake shop owner has triumphed over LGBT activists in court, and to top it all off, it happened in California.

The case began in August of last year, when Christian baker Cathy Miller of Tastries Bakery refused to bake a wedding cake for Mireya and Eileen Rodriguez-Del Rio, a gay couple, according to The Bakersfield Californian.

The gay couple filed a complaint with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing accusing Miller of violating the Unruh Civil Rights Act, a state law that prohibits discrimination based on characteristics such as sexual orientation. The DFEH subsequently filed a suit against Miller.

On Monday, Kern County Superior Court Judge David Lampe sided with the Christian baker and against the DFEH and the gay couple. The ruling was a stirring defense of religious liberty.

“A wedding cake is not just a cake in a Free Speech analysis. It is an artistic expression by the person making it that is to be used traditionally as a centerpiece in the celebration of a marriage,” he said, as reported by the Bakersfield Californian. “There could not be a greater form of expressive conduct.”

Yet DFEH sought to “compel Miller against her will and religion to allow her artistic expression in celebration of marriage to be co-opted to promote the message desired by same-sex marital partners, and with which Miller disagrees,” he added.
Here’s the key, though, that differentiated this case from that of, as an example, a Christian baker refusing to sell an already baked cake to a gay couple: “(T)he cake in question is not yet baked.”

Here’s the key, though, that differentiated this case from that of, as an example, a Christian baker refusing to sell an already baked cake to a gay couple: “(T)he cake in question is not yet baked.”

Thus, DFEH wasn’t merely “petitioning the court to order” Miller to bake a cake — it was demanding that the court force her “to use her talents to design and create a cake she has not yet conceived with the knowledge that her work will be displayed in celebration of a marital union her religion forbids.”

“For this court to force such compliance would do violence to the essentials of Free Speech guaranteed under the First Amendment,” Lampe concluded.

Lampe further noted in his ruling, America’s legal system is obligated “to protect Free Speech, regardless of whose foot the shoe is on.”

Judge Lampe’s full ruling.

New FBI Texts Suggest Obama’s Involvement in Hillary Email Investigation

Newly released text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page raise questions about the extent of President Barack Obama’s involvement in the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s misuse of her private email server.

In a message dated Sept. 2, 2016 — just two months before Election Day — Page wrote to Strzok about getting then-FBI Director James Comey ready to brief Obama.

Page’s reasoning was that;

“potus wants to know everything we’re doing.”

The texts shed more light on the timing of Comey’s Oct. 28 announcement that the FBI was reopening the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server misuse.

Just days before the election, Comey sent a letter to Congress explaining that the FBI had discovered more emails related to the Clinton case on former New York Rep. Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

One month before Comey announced the discovery of the new emails, Strzok suggested in a text to Page that the FBI already was aware of their existence.

“Got called up to (then-FBI Deputy director) Andy’s (McCabe) earlier.. hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s atty to sdny (Southern District of New York), includes a ton of material from spouse (Huma Abedin). Sending team up tomorrow to review… this will never end,” he wrote in a message dated Sept. 28.

“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday,” Comey said at the time.

Read More Here: https://www.westernjournal.com/latest-fbi-messages-reveal-obamas-involvement-hillary-email-investigation-senate-report-claims/

President Trump's State of the Union Speech Gets 75% Approval Rating

President Trump’s State of the Union address last night received a big response, as he pledged to close loop holes to deal with violent criminal gangs, backed Guantanamo Bay and pledged to stand up for “America’s struggling workers”.

The speech received an incredible reaction amongst those who watched it, with 75% approving of it according to a YouGov poll for CBS News.


The President reiterated that his “highest loyalty, my greatest compassion, and my constant concern is for America’s children, America’s struggling workers, and America’s forgotten communities”.

On the economy, Trump said that the “era of economic surrender is over” and pointed out how “the stock market has smashed one record after another, gaining $8 trillion in value.

The speech went down incredibly well, with a YouGov poll showing that 65% of those who watched said it made them feel proud and 35% said safer compared to just 21% who said angry and 14% who felt scared.

An Article by Charles K. Krauthammer Warning America of Obama Shadow Government.

This article was sent to me and was said to be authored by Charles Krauthammer. I have not yet been able to confirm this but the content of the article is very intriguing none the less and is well worth reading. I will link the article as soon as I find i

An article by Charles K. Krauthammer
New York Post:

I do not understand how living in a country with its democracy established over 200 years ago, and now, for the first time in history, suddenly we have one of our former presidents set up a group called "Organizing for Action" (OFA).

OFA is 30,000+ strong and working to disrupt everything that our current president’s administration is trying to do. This organization goes against our Democracy, and it is an operation that will destroy our way of governing. It goes against our Constitution, our laws, and the processes established over 200 years ago. If it is allowed to proceed then we will be living in chaos very much like third world countries are run. What good is it to have an established government if it is not going to be respected and allowed to follow our laws?

If you had an army some 30,000 strong and a court system stacked over the decades with judges who would allow you to break the laws, how much damage could you do to a country? We are about to find out in America!

Our ex-president said he was going to stay involved through community organizing and speak out on the issues and that appears to be one post-administration promise he intends to keep. He has moved many of his administration's top dogs over to Organizing for Action.

OFA is behind the strategic and tactical implementation of the resistance to the Trump Administration that we are seeing across America, and politically active courts are providing the leverage for this revolution.

OFA is dedicated to organizing communities for "progressive" change. Its issues are gun control, socialist healthcare, abortion, sexual equality, climate change, and of course, immigration reform. 

OFA members were propped up by the ex-president's message from the shadows: "Organizing is the building block of everything great we have accomplished Organizers around the country are fighting for change in their communities and OFA is one of the groups on the front lines. Commit to this work in 2017 and beyond.”

OFA’s website says it obtained its "digital" assets from the ex-president's re-election effort and that he inspired the movement. In short, it is the shadow government organization aimed at resisting and tearing down the Constitutional Republic we know as AMERICA. 

Paul Sperry, writing for the New York Post, says, “The OFA will fight President Donald Trump at every turn of his presidency and the ex-president will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House..”

Sperry writes that, “The ex-president is setting up a shadow government to sabotage the Trump administration through a network of non-profits led by OFA, which is growing its war chest (more than $40 million) and has some 250 offices nationwide. The OFA IRS filings, according to Sperry, indicate that the OFA has 32,525 (and growing) volunteers nationwide The ex-president and his wife will oversee the operation from their home/ office in Washington DC.

Think about how this works... For example: Trump issues an immigration executive order; the OFA signals for protests and statements from pro-immigrant groups; the ACLU lawyers file lawsuits in jurisdictions where activist judges obstruct the laws; volunteers are called to protest at airports and Congressional town hall meetings; the leftist media springs to action in support of these activities; the twitter sphere lights up with social media; and violence follows. All of this happens from the ex-president’s signal that he is heartened by the protests.

If Barack Obama did not do enough to destroy this country in the 8 years he was in office, it appears his future plans are to destroy the foundation on which this country has operated on for the last 241 years.

If this does not scare you, then we are in worse trouble than you know.
So, do your part. You have read it, so at least pass this on so others will know what we are up against. We are losing our country and we are so compliant We are becoming a "PERFECT TARGET" for our enemy!

Charles Krauthammer       
PS - OFA stands for left wing group called Organizing For America.