Time magazine talked to Bush's guru for Plame story.
Its legal appeals exhausted, Time magazine agreed last week to turn over reporter Matthew Cooper's e-mails and computer notes to a special prosecutor investigating the leak of an undercover CIA agent's identity. The case has been the subject of press controversy for two years. Saying "we are not above the law," Time Inc. Editor in Chief Norman Pearlstine decided to comply with a grand-jury subpoena to turn over documents related to the leak. But Cooper (and a New York Times reporter, Judith Miller) is still refusing to testify and faces jail this week.
Now the story may be about to take another turn. The e-mails surrendered by Time Inc., which are largely between Cooper and his editors, show that one of Cooper's sources was White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, according to two lawyers who asked not to be identified because they are representing witnesses sympathetic to the White House. Cooper and a Time spokeswoman declined to comment. But in an interview with NEWSWEEK, Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove had been interviewed by Cooper for the article. It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.
But according to Luskin, Rove's lawyer, Rove spoke to Cooper three or four days before Novak's column appeared. Luskin told NEWSWEEK that Rove "never knowingly disclosed classified information" and that "he did not tell any reporter that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA."
He noted that Rove had testified before the grand jury "two or three times" and signed a waiver authorizing reporters to testify about their conversations with him.
"He has answered every question that has been put to him about his conversations with Cooper and anybody else," Luskin said.
J.R. said...
Does anyone REALLY believe that if Karl Rove was the leaker that the main stream news media wouldn't have revealed him before the 2004 elections to damage the Bush Administartion. Get Real !
The last paragraphs also tell the story. Rove testified before the Grand Jury and even signed a waiver that would allow the reporters to testify as to their conversation with Rove.
I just don't see these main stream news media journalists falling on their sword for Rove.
This will probably be much to do about nothing. As it should be.
J.R.
2 comments:
Does anyone REALLY believe that if Karl Rove was the leaker that the main stream news media wouldn't have revealed him before the 2004 elections to damage the Bush Administartion. Get Real !
The last paragraphs also tell the story. Rove testified before the Grand Jury and even signed a waiver that would allow the reporters to testify as to their conversation with Rove.
I just don't see these main stream news media journalists falling on their sword for Rove.
This will probably be much to do about nothing. As it should be.
J.R.
Hi J.R.,
I enjoyed your blog. Keep up the good work!
-=Kevin
Post a Comment